Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0859320060240030171
Journal of the Korean Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
2006 Volume.24 No. 3 p.171 ~ p.178
Preliminary Results of Concurrent Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy using High-dose-rate Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer
Lee Kyung-Ja

Lee Ji-Hye
Lee Re-Na
Suh Hyun-Suk
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the efficacy and safety of concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy with high- dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

Materials and Methods: From January 2001 to December 2002, 30 patients with cervical cancer were treated with concurrent chemotherapy (cisplatin and 5-FU) and definitive radiation therapy. The median age was 58 (range 34¢¦74) year old. The pathology of the biopsy sections was squamous cell carcinoma in 29 patients and one was adenocarcinoma. The distribution to FIGO staging system was as follows: stage IB, 7 (23%); IIA, 3 (10%); IIB, 12 (40%); IIIA, 3 (10%); IIIB, 5 (17%). All patients received pelvic external beam irradiation (EBRT) to a total dose of 45¢¦50.4 Gy (median: 50.4 Gy) over 5¢¦5.5 weeks. Ir-192 HDR intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) was given after a total dose of 41.4 Gy. HDR-ICBT was performed twice a week, with a fraction point A dose of 4 Gy and median dose to point A was 28 Gy (range: 16¢¦32 Gy) in 7 fractions. The median cumulative biologic effective dose (BED) at point A (EBRT+ICBT) was 88 Gy10 (range: 77¢¦94 Gy10). The median cumulative BED at ICRU 38 reference point (EBRT+ICBT) was 131 Gy3 (range: 122¢¦140 Gy3) at point A, 109 Gy3 (range: 88¢¦125 Gy3) at the rectum and 111 Gy3 (range: 91¢¦123 Gy3) at the urinary bladder. Cisplatin (60 mg/m2) and 5-FU (1,000 mg/m2) was administered intravenously at 3 weeks interval from the first day of radiation for median 5 (range: 2¢¦6) cycles. The assessment was performed at 1 month after completion of radiation therapy by clinical examination and CT scan. The median follow-up time was 36 months (range: 8¢¦50 months).

Results: The complete response rate after concurrent chemoradiation therapy was 93.3%. The 3-yr actuarial pelvic control rate was 87% and 3-yr actuarial overall survival and disease-free survival rate was 93% and 87%, respectively. The local failure rate was 13% and distant metastatic rate was 3.3%. The crude rate of minor hematologic complications (RTOG grade 1-2) occurred in 3 patients (10%) and one patient had suffered from severe leukopenia (RTOG grade 4) during concurrent treatment. Acute minor enterocolitis (RTOG grade 1-2) occurred in 11 patients (37%) and one patient (3%) was suffered from colon perforation during radiation therapy. Late colitis of RTOG grade 1 occurred in 5 patients (15%). Acute cystitis of RTOG grade 1 occurred in 12 patients (40%) and late cystitis of RTOG grade 2 occurred in one patient (3%). No treatment related death was seen.

Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that the concurrent chemoradiation therapy with HDR brachytherapy could be accepted as an effective and safe treatment for cervical cancer.
KEYWORD
Cervical cancer, Chemoradiation therapy, HDR brachytherapy
FullTexts / Linksout information
   
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø